By Jay Butler
When a trust sells an appreciated asset, there is often an assumption that a taxable gain automatically arises simply because the sale occurred. Congress, through Subchapter J, approaches the issue differently. Before the tax consequences of a trust transaction can be determined, Congress required that the transaction be characterized under fiduciary accounting principles first. The central question is therefore not merely whether money entered the trust, but what that receipt is, how it is classified, and what consequences follow from that classification.
Congress deliberately incorporated trust-accounting principles into federal tax law through Subchapter J. Federal tax law did not create the fiduciary structure of a trust; it recognized and incorporated it. Internal Revenue Code § 643 (b) provides that trust accounting income is determined under the governing instrument and applicable local law. Congress did not create an independent federal definition of trust accounting income. Treasury Regulation § 1.643(b)-1 preserves this distinction between fiduciary accounting income and taxable income. As a result, fiduciary classification is the starting point for determining the tax consequences of trust transactions.
article continues after advertisement
Under the governing instrument, gains arising from the sale or exchange of trust assets are required to be allocated to corpus rather than income. Corpus, sometimes referred to as principal, consists of the assets held within the trust and administered by the trustee pursuant to the governing instrument. It is the trustee who determines whether a receipt is allocated to corpus or income under the governing instrument and applicable law. The trustee then determines whether assets allocated to corpus remain accumulated within the trust estate, free from current trust-level tax consequences, or become distributable pursuant to the terms of the trust. Only then do the resulting tax consequences flow from that determination under Subchapter J.
When a trust asset is sold, one asset within corpus is exchanged for another asset within corpus. Real estate becomes cash. Cryptocurrency becomes cash. While the form of the asset changes, the asset remains within the trust estate and under the trustee’s fiduciary control. Legal title remains with the trustee, who continues to administer the property pursuant to fiduciary duties imposed by the governing instrument and applicable law. No beneficiary has received a distribution, nor acquired possession or control of the proceeds, obtained constructive receipt, or acquired a present right to compel payment. The trust corpus remains intact notwithstanding the conversion of one asset form into another.
IRC § 643(a)(3) reinforces this framework by providing that gains from the sale or exchange of capital assets are excluded from Distributable Net Income (“DNI”) to the extent they are allocated to corpus and are not paid, credited, or required to be distributed to any beneficiary during the taxable year. DNI serves as the statutory measure of income that may be carried out to a beneficiary for tax purposes. Gains properly allocated to corpus, and excluded from DNI, remain within the trust estate and continue to be administered as corpus until the trustee elects to make a discretionary distribution pursuant to the governing instrument.
article continues after advertisement
This statutory structure reflects a logical sequence. Before the trustee performs the characterization required by § 643(b), it is impossible to determine what constitutes income, what constitutes corpus, what enters DNI, what remains principal, and what—if anything—is distributable to a beneficiary. Those determinations are not incidental; they are fundamental to the operation of Subchapter J. Any attempt to determine trust-level or beneficiary-level tax consequences before completing the fiduciary accounting process would bypass the sequence Congress established in § 643, which directs the fiduciary to determine the character of the receipt before the resulting tax consequences are calculated.
The statute operates in a straightforward order. First, the trustee characterizes the receipt under § 643(b) by allocating it between income and corpus. Second, the trustee determines whether the asset remains accumulated within corpus or becomes distributable under the governing instrument. Third, IRC § 643(a)(3) determines whether gains allocated to corpus are excluded from DNI. Only then can the resulting tax consequences be determined.
Properly understood, the issue is not whether a trust transaction has tax consequences, but when and how those consequences are determined under Subchapter J. Congress intended the fiduciary accounting characterization required by § 643(b) to govern that determination, and the statutory framework reflects that intent. By incorporating the governing instrument and applicable local law into the federal tax framework, Congress placed the trustee’s fiduciary accounting determination at the beginning of the analysis. Until that determination has been made, one cannot know whether a receipt constitutes income or corpus, whether it enters DNI, whether it remains accumulated within the trust estate, or whether it becomes distributable to a beneficiary.
In conclusion, where gains are allocated to corpus pursuant to the governing instrument, and remain within the trust estate, they are excluded from DNI under IRC § 643(a)(3), so long as they are neither paid, credited, or required to be distributed. Therefore, no current trust-level tax consequence arises merely because the underlying asset was sold and the resulting gain was allocated to corpus, excluded from DNI, and retained within the trust estate. The trustee’s determination comes first, not because the trustee supersedes federal law, but because Congress itself directed fiduciary accounting be applied first.
We welcome you to “Schedule Your Free 90-Minute Appointment” with us on the top right-hand corner of any page on our AssetProtectionServices.com website. We look forward to speaking with you, and working with you soon! Thank you~
MEET JAY BUTLER
Jay Butler is the Trustee of Asset Protection Services of America Trust, Manager of State Trustee Services LLC and the former Vice-President of Sales and Marketing for Corporate Support Services of Nevada, Inc. Mr. Butler holds a Bachelor’s Degree of Fine Arts from Boston University.
Jay has provided customized business entity structuring for clients in all 50 states along with some of the most respected names in the industry including the Jay Mitton organization “the father of asset protection” and Real Estate Investor Association seminars. He also appeared in numerous magazine articles in Reality 411, Ca$h-Flow and REI Wealth.
While working with Wealth Protection Concepts, LLC under the tutelage of the former Las Vegas and North Las Vegas city attorney Carl E. Lovell Jr. (now deceased from Leukemia), Mr. Butler was bestowed the title of “Asset Protection Planner” for his competency and experience. He also co-authored the first edition of his book “Cover Your Assets: Legal Authorities on Asset Protection, Tax Strategies and Estate Planning” © 2006 with Dr. Lovell.
When residing in Zug, Switzerland, Mr. Butler was the Associate Director of “CO-Handelszentrum GmbH” providing Swiss company formation and administration services and executed a full-range of fiduciary responsibilities including client support and international corporate compliance services (KYC, FATCA, AML and FATF).
Jay builds his relationships through consistent attention to detail and reliable support. He has traveled extensively throughout the United States (having visited 49 of the 50 states), explored 40 nations worldwide, and has lived in a total of 7 countries throughout North America, Central America, the Middle East, North Africa and Europe. Jay holds dual citizenship in the United States and Italy and permanently resides with his wife and daughter in Puglia.
Asset Protection Services of America Trust
Jay Butler, Trustee
732 South 6th Street
Suite N
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-6948
Office: (775) 461-5255
Website: www.AssetProtectionServices.com
